Hybrid Quark Model and Six-Quark Probability

Hybrid Quark Model and Six-Quark Probability

Author: Madhulika Research & Reviews: Journal of Physics-STM Journals Issn: 2278–2265 Date: 2026-01-19 04:45 Volume: 07 Issue: 02 Keyword: Quantum chromodynamics(QCD), quark degrees of freedom, six-quark bag Full Text PDF Submit Manuscript Journals

Abstract

Keyword: Quantum chromodynamics(QCD), quark degrees of freedom, six-quark bag

Refrences:

1. Wilczek F. Quantum Chromodynamics:
The Modern Theory of the Strong
Interaction. Annual Review of Nuclear and
Particle Science. 1982; 32: 177p2. Soding P, Wolf G. Experimental Evidence
on QCD. Annual Review of Nuclear and
Particle Science. 1981; 31: 231p.
3. Brown LS, Ellis SD. Energy-energy
correlations in electron-positron
annihilation. Physical Review D.. 1981; 24:
2383p.
4. Fucito F, Mortinelli G, Omero C, Parisi G,
Petronzio R, Rapuano F. Calculation of the
hadron spectrum in lattice QCD. Nuclear
Physics. 1982; B210: 407p.
5. Shifman MA, Vainshtein AI, Zakharov V.
QCD and resonance physics. Applications.
Nuclear Physics. 1979; D147 385:
448,519p.
6. Henley EM, Kamimura M, Motoba T,
Yamada T, Yamamoto Y. Structure of
hypernuclei in relativistic approaches. Phys
Rev. 1996; C53: 2075-2085p.
7. Greben JM, Thomas AW. Mass differences
between mirror nuclei in a hybrid quarknucleon model. Physical Review. 1984;
C30: 1021p.
8. Moshinsky M. Transformation brackets for
harmonic oscillator functions. Nuclear
Physics. 1959; 13: 104p.
9. Slater J. The Theory of Complex Spectra.
Physical Review. 1929; 34(1293): 174p.
10. Mehrotra I, Mehrotra M. Six Quark
Cluster effects and ∧-Binding Energy
Difference between A=6 Mirror
Hypernuclei 6
∧He –
6
∧Li. Acta Physica
Polonica B. 2000; 31(4): 931–940p.
11. Mehrotra M, Mehrotra M, Quark Degree of
Freedom in the Binding Energy Difference
of 14∧C~ 14∧N. Journal of Nucl.
Engineering & Tech. 2017; 7(1): 17–27p.
12. Mehrotra M, Mehrotra M. Six Quark
cluster formation effects on the magnetic
moments of mirror nuclei with closed core
+ one nucleon. Journal of Nucl.
Engineering & Tech. 2017; 7(2):12–19p.
13. Miller GA. New Physical Interpretation for
Time in Scattering Theory. Physical
Review Letters. 1984; 53: 208p

>