Moshinsky Transformation and Slater Integral Methods as Evaluation Tools for Overlap Probability in Six-Quark Bag

Moshinsky Transformation and Slater Integral Methods as Evaluation Tools for Overlap Probability in Six-Quark Bag

Author: Madhulika Journal of Nuclear Engineering & Technology-STM Journals Issn: 2277-6184 Date: 2026-01-19 12:54 Volume: 08 Issue: 03 Keyword: Moshinsky transformation, Slater integral, hypernuclei, binding energy difference of mirror hypernuclei pairs, six-quark probability Full Text PDF Submit Manuscript Journals

Abstract

A comparative study of Moshinsky transformation and Slater integral methods in successful calculation of Binding Energy of mirror hypernuclei pairs ( 6 He ~6 Li   , 14 14 C ~ N   ), using six-quark probability of nucleon-nucleon ( ( ) 6 0 q NN P r ) and nucleon-Λ hyperon ( ( ) 6 0 q N P r  ). The contribution of direct and exchange terms to the six-quark probability show that the Pauli exchange terms in ( ) 0 6 P r q NN is about 40% of the direct term, which leads to a sizable reduction in the six-quark probability. It is observed that the six-quark cluster formation probabilities obtained in Slater method are larger than the corresponding values obtained in Moshinsky method.

Keyword: Moshinsky transformation, Slater integral, hypernuclei, binding energy difference of mirror hypernuclei pairs, six-quark probability

Refrences:

  1. Fernandez F, Oset E. A model of the double-spin-flip NN amplitude based on a one-pion exchange potential with quark
    exchange. Nuclear Physics A. 1986; 455: 720p.
  2.  Henley EM, Kamimura M, Motoba T,
    Yamada T, Yamamoto Y. Structure of
    hypernuclei in relativistic approaches.
    Phys Rev. 1996; C53: 2075–2085p.
    3. Moshinsky M. Transformation brackets
    for harmonic oscillator functions. Nuclear
    Physics. 1959; 13: 104p.
    4. [4] Slater J. The Theory of Complex
    Spectra. Physical Review. 1929; 34(1293):
    174p.
    5. Koch V, Miller GA. Six quark cluster
    effects and binding energy differences
    between Mirror Nuclei. Physics Review.
    1985 (C31): 602; (C32): 1106p.
    6. Brody TA, Jocob G, Moshinsky M. Matrix
    elements in nuclear shell theory. Nuclear
    Physics. 1960(17): 16–29p.
    7. Bando H, Motoba T, Yamomoto Y.
    Narrow widths of Λ single particle states
    in Hypernuclei. Physics Review.
    1985(C31): 265p.
    8. Mehrotra I. A comparative study
    of , , and nuclei.
    Canadian Journal of Physics. 1991,
    69(11): 1334–1337p.
    https://doi.org/10.1139/p91–199.
    9. Mujib F, Shoeb M, Usmani QN, Khan
    MZR. Analysis of p-shell Hypernuclei
    with Effective λ-nucleon Potentials.
    Journal of Physics G: Nuclear Physics.
    1979; 5(4):541p.
    10. Mehrotra M, Mehrotra M. Quark Degree
    of Freedom in the Binding Energy
    Difference of 14∧C~ 14∧N. Journal of
    Nuclear Engineering & Technology. 2017;
    7(1): 17–27p.
    11. Gal A, Soper JM, Dalitz RH. 1971, 1972
    Ann. Phys. 63 53; 72 445; 1978 113 79.
    12. Wang F, Wong CW, Lu SQ. Nuclear
    Physics. 1988; (A480): 490p.
>